Strange Brew!

May 28, 2015

Have the horses left the barn? One of the major tenants of Dow Theory is that the averages must confirm each other. The key to this basic tenant is that no important bull or bear market can take place unless both averages agree with each other. Originally, Dow Theory was referring to the Industrial and Rail averages. Today the theory refers to the Industrials and the Transports. It is not necessary for the two to confirm a signal simultaneously but they should be at least relatively close together.

So have the Industrials and the Transports confirmed each other? Of late no. The Dow Jones Transports (DJT) made its high back on November 28, 2014. That high has not been seen since. For the next five months, the DJT chopped around while the Dow Jones Industrials (DJI) made new highs in late December, again in March and most recently on May 19, 2015. By that time the DJT was roughly 500 points below its late November high. Three new highs by the DJI, lower highs or just considerably lower by the DJT. Three strikes and one is supposed to be out. Maybe it is.

The very next day (May 20, 2015) the markets plunged. The DJT was down sharply on high volume. The DJI? Well it barely moved. Another divergence. The DJT has given a number of intermediate sell signals and on May 26, 2015, the index was at its lowest level since October 2014. The DJI Fell over 200 points on May 26, 2015 but is now only testing its 50-day MA.

The chart of the DJI and the DJT shows this growing divergence between the two Dow indices. The DJI like the S&P 500 appears to be forming a large ascending wedge triangle. A breakdown under 17,900 could suggest a decline back to the October 2014 lows. As for the DJT well it may be trying to form a descending wedge triangle (the opposite of an ascending wedge triangle). But it is inconclusive at this stage.

What is important, however, is that these divergences between the DJI and the DJT do not occur with regularity. Not surprisingly these divergences usually only occur at significant tops and bottoms. A review of some of them follows.

Source: www.stockcharts.com

 

March 2009 – Both the DJI and the DJT made new lows. It is not often that both the DJI and the DJT confirm each other at what turned out to be a significant low.

July to October 2007 – The DJT made its high in July 2007. When the DJI made its final high in October 2007 the DJT was already sharply lower.

October 2002 to March 2003 – Both the DJI and the DJT made new lows together in October 2002. In March 2003 the DJT fell to new lows while the DJI made a higher low. That low turned out to be the final low before the bull market that topped in 2007 got underway.

May 1999 to January 2000 – The DJT made a high in May 1999. Over the next several months the DJT was trending lower. The DJI also made a high in May 1999 then continued to new highs in July and August 1999. Following a period where the markets were generally down the DJI moved to another new high in January 2000. That turned out to be the final high for the DJI as the markets collapsed into the 2000-2002 high tech/internet collapse. The DJI made a lower high in March 2000 while the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ were both making new highs.

April 1998 to July 1998 – The DJT made a high in April 1998. The DJI made a higher high in July 1998 while the DJT was making a lower high.

November/December 1994 – Both the DJI and the DJT made important lows in late November 1994. In December 1994, the DJT plunged to new lows while the DJI made a higher low. That low proved to be an important low prior to the big bull market of 1995-2000.

1990 – The DJI and the DJT both made highs in June 1990 but one month later the DJI made new highs while the DJT was not even close. That proved to be the top prior to a sharp drop in 1990. The DJI made its final low in October 1990. Over the next two months, the DJI started to move higher but the DJT kept testing the October low. Nonetheless, it proved to the final low before the 1990’s bull market got underway.

The current divergence between the DJI and the DJT is one of the most pronounced seen over the past fifteen years. These type of divergences normally only take place at important tops and bottoms. The advance that has been seen over the past year has been constructed mostly by the companies in the indices buying back their own stock. In many instances, the purchases have been financed by issuing new debt. Goldman Sachs had noted in late 2014 that buybacks constituted one of the largest sources of US equity demand over the past few years.

Buying back one’s own stock is a non-constructive activity. And while it helps push up the value of the stock, it has little if any economic value. Rising stock values can translate into increased compensation for management of the companies. It is estimated by some that buy-backs could hit as high as $450 billion in 2015. Previous highs in share buy-backs were seen leading into both the 2000 market high and the 2007 market high.

Over the past year numerous indicators have been deteriorating. Sentiment indicators remain at or near record highs. An interesting indicator is the McClellan Oscillator. The McClellan Oscillator is an oscillator that takes the differential between two exponential moving averages of daily market breadth. A rising oscillator is an indication of money flowing in…while a falling oscillator is more indicative of money flowing out. Extreme readings are an indication of overbought or oversold conditions. Values below zero are an indication that money is leaving the market. The McClellan Oscillator turned negative on May 22, 2015 even as the market continued higher in price.

Source: www.stockcharts.com

Warning signs have been creeping into the market for months even as it moves higher. Continued divergences between the indices are a sign that something is brewing. In the past these divergences signalled market collapses of between 20% to 55%. This is a brew that may not be palatable to many investors.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved David Chapman 

General Disclosures

The information and opinions contained in this report were prepared by Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. (‘IA Securities’). IA Securities is subsidiary of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. (‘Industrial Alliance’). Industrial Alliance is a TSX Exchange listed company and as such, IA Securities is an affiliate of Industrial Alliance. The opinions, estimates and projections contained in this report are those of IA Securities as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. IA Securities endeavours to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that we believe to be reliable and contain information and opinions that are accurate and complete. However, IA Securities makes no representations or warranty, express or implied, in respect thereof, takes no responsibility for any errors and omissions contained herein and accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use of, or reliance on, this report or its contents. Information may be available to IA Securities that is not reflected in this report. This report is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The reader should not rely solely on this report in evaluating whether or not to buy or sell securities of the subject company.

Definitions

“Technical Strategist” means any partner, director, officer, employee or agent of IA Securities who is held out to the public as a strategist or whose responsibilities to IA Securities include the preparation of any written technical market report for distribution to clients or prospective clients of IA Securities which does not include a recommendation with respect to a security.

 “Technical Market Report” means any written or electronic communication that IA Securities has distributed or will distribute to its clients or the general public, which contains an strategist’s comments concerning current market technical indicators.

Conflicts of Interest

The technical strategist and or associates who prepared this report are compensated based upon (among other factors) the overall profitability of IA Securities, which may include the profitability of investment banking and related services. In the normal course of its business, IA Securities may provide financial advisory services for issuers. IA Securities will include any further issuer related disclosures as needed.

Technical Strategists Certification

Each IA Securities technical strategist whose name appears on the front page of this technical market report hereby certifies that (i) the opinions expressed in the technical market report accurately reflect the technical strategist’s personal views about the marketplace and are the subject of this report and all strategies mentioned in this report that are covered by such technical strategist and (ii) no part of the technical strategist’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly, related to the specific views expressed by such technical strategies in this report.

Technical Strategists Trading

IA Securities permits technical strategists to own and trade in the securities and or the derivatives of the sectors discussed herein.

Dissemination of Reports

IA Securities uses its best efforts to disseminate its technical market reports to all clients who are entitled to receive the firm’s technical market reports, contemporaneously on a timely and effective basis in electronic form, via fax or mail. Selected technical market reports may also be posted on the IA Securities website and davidchapman.com.

For Canadian Residents: This report has been approved by IA Securities, which accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Canada. Canadian clients wishing to effect transactions should do so through a qualified salesperson of IA Securities in their particular jurisdiction where their IA is licensed.

For US Residents: This report is not intended for distribution in the United States. 

Intellectual Property Notice

The materials contained herein are protected by copyright, trademark and other forms of proprietary rights and are owned or controlled by IA Securities or the party credited as the provider of the information.

Regulatory

IA Securities is a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (‘CIPF’) and the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (‘IIROC’).

Copyright

All rights reserved. All material presented in this document may not be reproduced in whole or in part, or further published or distributed or referred to in any manner whatsoever, nor may the information, opinions or conclusions contained in it be referred to without in each case the prior express written consent of IA Securities Inc.

The word ‘silver’ originates from the Old English Anglo-Saxon word 'seolfor'

Silver Phoenix Twitter                 Silver Phoenix on Facebook